4.8 Article

Spectrum of Exfoliable 1D van der Waals Molecular Wires and Their Electronic Properties

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 9851-9859

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.1c00781

关键词

van der Waals materials; one-dimensional wires; layered heterostructures; photoluminescence; exfoliation

资金

  1. NSF [DMREF-1174625, DMR-1455050]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research has shown that one-dimensional van der Waals materials may retain their bulk properties, and certain 1D substances can be distinguished from bulk materials, with potential for various applications.
Two-dimensional (2D) materials derived from van der Waals (vdW)-bonded layered crystals have been the subject of considerable research focus, but their one-dimensional (1D) analogues have received less attention. These bulk crystals consist of covalently bonded mnultiatomn atomic chains with weak van der Waals bonds between adjacent chains. Using density-functional-theory-based methods, we find the binding energies of several 1D families of materials to be within typical exfoliation ranges possible for 2D materials. In addition, we compute the electronic properties of a variety of insulating, semiconducting, and metallic individual wires and find differences that could enable the identification of and distinction between 1D, 2D, and 3D forms during mechanical exfoliation onto a substrate. We find ID wires from chemical families of the forms PdBr2, SbSeI, and GePdS3 are likely to be distinguishable from bulk materials via photoluminescence. Like 2D vdW materials, we find some of these 1D vdW materials have the potential to retain their bulk properties down to nearly atomic film thicknesses, including the structural families of HfI3, and PNF2, a useful property for some applications including electronic interconnects. We also study naturally occurring bulk crystalline heterostructures of 1D wires and identify two families that are likely to be exfoliable and identifiable as individual 1D wire subcomponents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据