4.8 Article

Biocompatible Ruthenium Single-Atom Catalyst for Cascade Enzyme-Mimicking Therapy

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 13, 期 38, 页码 45269-45278

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c12706

关键词

single-atom enzyme; multienzyme-mimicking activities; ROS damage; ruthenium; carbon dots

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0208300, 2017YFA0700104]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21671180, 32101121]
  3. DNL Cooperation Fund, CAS [NDL201918]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK2060120004]
  5. CAS Fujian Institute of Innovation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully constructed Ru single-atom enzymes with superior activity and stability by using carbon dots as the carrier material, leading to a lethal effect on cancer cells. The Ru single-atom enzymes exhibit excellent peroxidase-like activity, activating H2O2 to produce reactive oxygen species that cause damage to cancer cells.
Rationally constructing single-atom enzymes (SAEs) with superior activity, robust stability, and good biocompatibility is crucial for tumor therapy but still remains a substantial challenge. In this work, we adopt biocompatible carbon dots as the carrier material to load Ru single atoms, achieving Ru SAEs with superior multiple enzyme-like activity and stability. Ru SAEs behave as oxidase, peroxidase, and glutathione oxidase mimics to synchronously catalyze the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the depletion of glutathione, thus amplifying the ROS damage and finally causing the death of cancer cells. Notably, Ru SAEs exhibit excellent peroxidaselike activity with a specific activity of 7.5 U/mg, which surpasses most of the reported SAEs and is 20 times higher than that of Ru/C. Theoretical results reveal that the electrons of the Ru 4d orbital in Ru SAEs are transferred to O atoms in H2O2 and then efficiently activate H2O2 to produce .OH. Our work may provide some inspiration for the design of SAEs for cancer therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据