4.8 Article

Cationic Covalent Organic Framework as an Ion Exchange Material for Efficient Adsorptive Separation of Biomolecules

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 13, 期 29, 页码 35019-35025

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c11270

关键词

covalent organic framework; bioseparation; ion exchange chromatography; proteins; amino acids

资金

  1. Center for Membrane Science, Engineering and Technology (MAST)
  2. National Science Foundation [IIP 1822101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study explored the use of ionic COF Py-BPy+-COF as an ion exchange material for biomolecule separation, demonstrating high adsorption capacities and selectivity for different amino acids and proteins. Desorption experiments showed successful separation of proteins based on isoelectric point, hydrophobicity, and ability to penetrate the crystalline material, suggesting Py-BPy2+-COF can be a robust anion exchange biomolecule separation material.
Although covalent organic frameworks (COFs) have earned significant interest in separation applications, the use of COFs in biomolecule separation remains unexplored. We examined the ionic COF Py-BPy+-COF as an ion exchange material for biomolecule separation. After characterizing the properties of the synthesized COF with a variety of techniques, binding experiments with both large and small biomolecules were performed. High adsorption capacities of amino acids with different hydrophobicity and charge, as well as proteins of different isoelectric points and molecular weights, were determined in batch equilibrium experiments. Desorption experiments with mixtures of model proteins demonstrated an ability to successfully separate one protein from another with the selectivity hypothesized to be a combination of the isoelectric point, hydrophobicity, and ability to penetrate the crystalline material. Overall, the results demonstrated Py-BPy2+-COF can be exploited as a robust crystalline anion exchange biomolecule separation material.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据