4.7 Article

In-plane anisotropic optical and mechanical properties of two-dimensional MoO3

期刊

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41699-021-00220-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [755655]
  2. European Commission [881603]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness [MAT201787134-C2-2-R]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (MINECO) [2017 FJCI-2017-32919]
  5. grant Grupos Consolidados UPV/EHU del Gobierno Vasco [IT1249-19]
  6. MICINN [FIS2016-79464-P, IJC2018-038164-I]
  7. MINECO [MINECOG17/A01]
  8. Spanish MICIU [RTI2018-099054-J-I00]
  9. [PRE2018-084818]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The in-plane anisotropy of molybdenum trioxide (MoO3) has attracted increasing attention from the scientific community, with observed properties stemming from the material's anisotropic refractive index and elastic constants. Raman and micro-reflectance measurements were used to determine the angular dependence of the refractive index of thin MoO3 flakes, while the directional dependence of the MoO3 Young's modulus was studied using the buckling metrology method. It was found that MoO3 exhibits one of the largest in-plane anisotropic mechanical properties reported for 2D materials.
Molybdenum trioxide (MoO3) in-plane anisotropy has increasingly attracted the attention of the scientific community in the last few years. Many of the observed in-plane anisotropic properties stem from the anisotropic refractive index and elastic constants of the material but a comprehensive analysis of these fundamental properties is still lacking. Here we employ Raman and micro-reflectance measurements, using polarized light, to determine the angular dependence of the refractive index of thin MoO3 flakes and we study the directional dependence of the MoO3 Young's modulus using the buckling metrology method. We found that MoO3 displays one of the largest in-plane anisotropic mechanical properties reported for 2D materials so far.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据