4.7 Article

European Database of Carotenoid Levels in Foods. Factors Affecting Carotenoid Content

期刊

FOODS
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods10050912

关键词

agro-food; agronomy; food composition; fruits and vegetables

资金

  1. COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) [CA15136]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies show that diets rich in carotenoid have positive effects on health. This research established a carotenoid content database of foods in the European market and emphasized the importance of integrating nutritional standards and promoting biodiversity in agricultural choices.
Many studies indicate that diets including carotenoid-rich foods have positive effects on human health. Some of these compounds are precursors of the essential nutrient vitamin A. The present work is aimed at implementing a database of carotenoid contents of foods available in the European market. Factors affecting carotenoid content were also discussed. Analytical data available in peer-reviewed scientific literature from 1990 to 2018 and obtained by HPLC/UHPLC were considered. The database includes foods classified according to the FoodEx2 system and will benefit compilers, nutritionists and other professionals in areas related to food and human health. The results show the importance of food characterization to ensure its intercomparability, as large variations in carotenoid levels are observed between species and among varieties/cultivars/landraces. This highlights the significance of integrating nutritional criteria into agricultural choices and of promoting biodiversity. The uncertainty quantification associated with the measurements of the carotenoid content was very rarely evaluated in the literature consulted. According to the EuroFIR data quality evaluation system for food composition tables, the total data quality index mean was 24 in 35, reflecting efforts by researchers in the analytical methods, and less resources in the sampling plan documentation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据