4.7 Article

The Effects of Nisin-Producing Lactococcus lactis Strain Used as Probiotic on Gilthead Sea Bream (Sparus aurata) Growth, Gut Microbiota, and Transcriptional Response

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2021.659519

关键词

aquaculture; gilthead sea bream; probiotic; Lactococcus lactis; gut microbiota; transcriptomic

资金

  1. EU Horizon 2020 Research Innovation Program under the TNA program at IATS-CSIC research infrastructure within AQUAEXCEL2020 project [AE130011, 652831]
  2. EU Horizon 2020 AquaIMPACT project [818367]
  3. Ramon y Cajal Postdoctoral Research Fellowship [European Social Fund (ESF)] [RYC2018-024049-I/AEI/10.13039/501100011033]
  4. Ramon y Cajal Postdoctoral Research Fellowship [ACOND/2020 Generalitat Valenciana] [RYC2018-024049-I/AEI/10.13039/501100011033]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The addition of nisin-producing Lactococcus lactis in gilthead sea bream had effects on growth performance, transcriptional response, and microbiota, without colonization in the host's intestinal mucosa. The probiotic in the diets modulated the gut microbiota of fish, leading to host modifications without necessarily colonizing the intestine mucosa.
The present research tested the effects of dietary nisin-producing Lactococcus lactis on growth performance, feed utilization, intestinal morphology, transcriptional response, and microbiota in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata). A feeding trial was conducted with fish weighting 70-90 g. Fish were tagged with passive, integrated transponders and distributed in nine 500 L tanks with 40 fish each. Fish were fed for 12 weeks with either a control (diet A) or experimental diets (diets B and C) in triplicate (3 tanks/diet). Extruded pellets of diets B and C were supplemented with a low (2 & times; 109 CFU/kg) and a high (5 & times; 109 CFU/kg) dose of probiotic, respectively. No significant differences were found between groups for the feed conversion ratio or specific growth rates. However, the final body weight of fish fed diet C was significantly higher than the control group with intermediate values for fish fed diet B. Histological analysis conducted using a semi-quantitative scoring system showed that probiotic did not alter the morphology of the intestine and did not trigger inflammation. With regard to the transcriptomic response, a customized PCR array layout was designed to simultaneously profile a panel of 44 selected genes. Significant differences in the expression of key genes involved in innate and acquired immunity were detected between fish fed probiotic and control diets. To analyze the microbiota associated to the feeds and the gut autochthonous microbial communities, we used the Illumina MiSeq platform for sequencing the 16S rRNA gene and a metagenomics pipeline based on VSEARCH and RDP databases. The analysis of gut microbiota revealed a lack of colonization of the probiotic in the host's intestinal mucosa. However, probiotic did modulate the fish gut microbiota, confirming that colonization is not always necessary to induce host modification. In fact, diets B and C were enriched with Actinomycetales, as compared to diet A, which instead showed a higher percentage of Pseudomonas, Sphyngomonas, and Lactobacillus genera. These results were confirmed by the clear separation of gut bacterial community of fish fed with the probiotic from the bacterial community of control fish group in the beta-diversity and PLS-DA (supervised partial least-squares discriminant analysis) analyses. Superscript/Subscript Available

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据