4.4 Article

Imaging, clinical, and pathologic findings of Sertoli-leydig cell tumors

期刊

SCIENCE PROGRESS
卷 104, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/00368504211009668

关键词

Sertoli-leydig cell tumors; CT; MRI; pathology; ovary

资金

  1. Nature Science Foundation of China [81771899]
  2. Jiangsu Province Hospital of peak academic personnel training project [y2018rc04]
  3. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [SJCX20_0514]
  4. Key Project of Chinese Medicine Technology Development Plan of Jiangsu Province [ZD201907]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors (SLCTs) predominantly affect young women and present with clinical symptoms of androgen overproduction. Imaging characteristics include unilateral oval or round tumors with the solid part showing isoattenuation on CT and marked enhancement on contrast-enhanced images. DICER1 hotspot mutations are commonly observed in SLCTs.
To explore the clinical features, imaging findings, and pathological manifestations of ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors (SLCTs). The clinical and pathological manifestations, tumor location, size, morphology, vascularity, computed tomography (CT) density, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal intensity, and contrast enhancement patterns in five cases with SLCTs were retrospectively reviewed. SLCTs most commonly occurred in young women. Virilization was observed in three cases (60%). All five tumors were unilateral and oval or round, with a clear boundary. The solid part of the tumor was isoattenuated on the conventional CT scan, and showed isoattenuation or slight hypoattenuation relative to adjacent myometrium on T1 weighted imaging (T1WI) and T2 weighted imaging (T2WI). On contrast-enhanced images, three tumors showed marked enhancement. DICER1 hotspot mutations were commonly seen in SLCTs. A highly vascularized mass with low signal intensity (SI) of the solid part on T2WI and androgen overproduction symptoms may suggest an SLCT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据