4.7 Article

Biodistribution and Pharmacokinectics of Liposomes and Exosomes in a Mouse Model of Sepsis

期刊

PHARMACEUTICS
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13030427

关键词

biodistribution; exosome; liposome; sepsis; pharmacokinetics; near-infrared imaging

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation - Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea [NRF-2017R1E1A1A01074847]
  2. ILIAS Biologics Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exosomes have potential as drug delivery vehicles due to their ability to selectively deliver therapeutic cargoes to disease sites. The in vivo behaviors of exosomes are affected by pathophysiological conditions, and exosomes exhibit specific behaviors in sepsis mice compared to liposomes. This suggests that exosome-based therapeutics may be effective in managing sepsis and septic shock.
Exosomes have attracted considerable attention as drug delivery vehicles because their biological properties can be utilized for selective delivery of therapeutic cargoes to disease sites. In this context, analysis of the in vivo behaviors of exosomes in a diseased state is required to maximize their therapeutic potential as drug delivery vehicles. In this study, we investigated biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of HEK293T cell-derived exosomes and PEGylated liposomes, their synthetic counterparts, into healthy and sepsis mice. We found that biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of exosomes were significantly affected by pathophysiological conditions of sepsis compared to those of liposomes. In the sepsis mice, a substantial number of exosomes were found in the lung after intravenous injection, and their prolonged blood residence was observed due to the liver dysfunction. However, liposomes did not show such sepsis-specific effects significantly. These results demonstrate that exosome-based therapeutics can be developed to manage sepsis and septic shock by virtue of their sepsis-specific in vivo behaviors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据