4.8 Article

Weaker bonding can give larger thermal conductance at highly mismatched interfaces

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 7, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abf8197

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [19H00744]
  2. JST CREST [JPMJCR20Q3, JPMJCR19I2]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19H00744] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates a counterintuitive phenomenon where a weak van der Waals interface may exhibit higher thermal boundary conductance than a strong covalently bonded interface in a system with highly mismatched vibrational frequencies. The results suggest a trade-off relationship between bridging and binding effects, with bridging potentially overwhelming binding effects at highly mismatched interfaces. This comprehensive understanding of phonon transport at interfaces allows for tailored thermal transport in various material systems.
Thermal boundary conductance is typically positively correlated with interfacial adhesion at the interface. Here, we demonstrate a counterintuitive experimental result in which a weak van der Waals interface can give a higher thermal boundary conductance than a strong covalently bonded interface. This occurs in a system with highly mismatched vibrational frequencies (copper/diamond) modified by a self-assembled monolayer. Using finely controlled fabrication and detailed characterization, complemented by molecular simulation, the effects of bridging the vibrational spectrum mismatch and bonding at the interface are systematically varied and understood from a molecular dynamics viewpoint. The results reveal that the bridging and binding effects have a trade-off relationship and, consequently, that the bridging can overwhelm the binding effect at a highly mismatched interface. This study provides a comprehensive understanding of phonon transport at interfaces, unifying physical and chemical understandings, and allowing interfacial tailoring of the thermal transport in various material systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据