4.3 Review

SBRT for HCC: Overview of technique and treatment response assessment

期刊

ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY
卷 46, 期 8, 页码 3615-3624

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03107-7

关键词

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Radiation therapy; Stereotactic body radiation therapy; Computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SBRT is an emerging locoregional treatment for HCC, with decision-making and assessment of treatment response requiring a multidisciplinary approach. Continuous imaging evaluation is crucial for guiding patient management and avoiding misinterpretation of post-treatment changes.
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an emerging locoregional treatment (LRT) modality used in the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The decision to treat HCC with LRT is evaluated in a multidisciplinary setting, and the specific LRT chosen depends on the treatment intent, such as bridge-to-transplant, down-staging to transplant, definitive/curative treatment, and/or palliation, as well as underlying patient clinical factors. Accurate assessment of treatment response is necessary in order to guide clinical management in these patients. Patients who undergo LRT need continuous imaging evaluation to assess treatment response and to evaluate for recurrence. Thus, an accurate understanding of expected post-SBRT imaging findings is critical to avoid misinterpreting normal post-treatment changes as local progression or viable tumor. SBRT-treated HCC demonstrates unique imaging findings that differ from HCC treated with other forms of LRT. In particular, SBRT-treated HCC can demonstrate persistent APHE and washout on short-term follow-up imaging. This brief review summarizes current evidence for the use of SBRT for HCC, including patient population, SBRT technique and procedure, tumor response assessment on contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging with expected findings, and pitfalls in treatment response evaluation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据