The Pitfalls of Using Potentiodynamic Polarization Curves for Tafel Analysis in Electrocatalytic Water Splitting

How to Reliably Report the Overpotential of an Electrocatalyst

(2020) Siqi Niu et al.   ACS Energy Letters

Systematic study of the influence of iR compensation on water electrolysis

(2020) L. Yu et al.   Materials Today Physics

Best Practices in Using Foam-Type Electrodes for Electrocatalytic Performance Benchmark

(2020) Weiran Zheng et al.   ACS Energy Letters

Recommended Practices and Benchmark Activity for Hydrogen and Oxygen Electrocatalysis in Water Splitting and Fuel Cells

(2019) Chao Wei et al.   ADVANCED MATERIALS

Do the Evaluation Parameters Reflect Intrinsic Activity of Electrocatalysts in Electrochemical Water Splitting?

(2019) Sengeni Anantharaj et al.   ACS Energy Letters

Benchmarks and Protocols for Electrolytic, Photoelectrochemical, and Solar-Thermal Water-Splitting Technologies

(2019) Shannon W. Boettcher   ACS Energy Letters

Precision and correctness in the evaluation of electrocatalytic water splitting: revisiting activity parameters with a critical assessment

(2018) S. Anantharaj et al.   Energy & Environmental Science

Best Practices for Reporting Electrocatalytic Performance of Nanomaterials

(2018) Damien Voiry et al.   ACS Nano

Recent advances in transition metal phosphide nanomaterials: synthesis and applications in hydrogen evolution reaction

(2016) Yanmei Shi et al.   CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS

Cobalt–Iron (Oxy)hydroxide Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysts: The Role of Structure and Composition on Activity, Stability, and Mechanism

(2015) Michaela S. Burke et al.   JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY

Insight on Tafel slopes from a microkinetic analysis of aqueous electrocatalysis for energy conversion

(2015) Tatsuya Shinagawa et al.   Scientific Reports

Redox and electrochemical water splitting catalytic properties of hydrated metal oxide modified electrodes

(2013) Richard L. Doyle et al.   PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS