4.6 Article

Identification of Key Genes Related to the Prognosis of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Based on Chip Re-Annotation

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11073229

关键词

esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; chip re-annotation; DEGs; bioinformatics analyses; prognostic biomarkers

资金

  1. Shenzhen Strategic Emerging Industry Development Special Funds [JCYJ20170816143646446]
  2. Shenzhen Science and Technology Research and Development Funds [JCYJ20200109143018683]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through gene chip re-annotation and bioinformatics analysis, we identified four genes with diagnostic and prognostic significance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), as well as different patterns of immune infiltration related to differentially expressed genes (DEGs).
Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the deadliest cancers worldwide. However, reliable biomarkers for early diagnosis, or those for the prognosis of therapy, remain unfulfilled goals for its subtype esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The purpose of this study was to identify reliable biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of ESCC by gene chip re-annotation technique and downstream bioinformatics analysis. In our research, the GSE53624 dataset was downloaded from the GEO database. Then, we reannotated the gene expression probe and obtained the gene expression matrix. Differential expressed genes (DEGs) were found by R packages and they were subjected to Gene Ontology enrichment analysis and protein-protein interaction (PPI) network construction. As a result, a total of 28,885 mRNA probes were reannotated, among which 210 down-regulated and 80 up-regulated DEGs were screened out. By combining these genes set in clinical prognosis information and Western blot analysis, we found four genes with diagnostic and prognostic significance, including MMP13, SPP1, MMP10, and COL1A1. Furthermore, markers of infiltrating immune cells exhibited different DEG-related immune infiltration patterns.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据