The methodological quality of 176,620 randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2018 reveals a positive trend but also an urgent need for improvement

RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

(2019) Jonathan A C Sterne et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

Inter-review agreement of risk-of-bias judgments varied in Cochrane reviews

(2019) Nadja Könsgen et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Technology-assisted risk of bias assessment in systematic reviews: a prospective cross-sectional evaluation of the RobotReviewer machine learning tool

(2018) Allison Gates et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Clinical trial design and dissemination: comprehensive analysis of clinicaltrials.gov and PubMed data since 2005

(2018) Magdalena Zwierzyna et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

Clinical trial design and dissemination: comprehensive analysis of clinicaltrials.gov and PubMed data since 2005

(2018) Magdalena Zwierzyna et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research study

(2017) Agnes Dechartres et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research study

(2017) Agnes Dechartres et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews of Non-Randomized Studies of Adverse Cardiovascular Effects of Thiazolidinediones and Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: Application of a New Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool

(2016) Anja Bilandzic et al.   PLOS MEDICINE

Sharing Clinical Trial Data

(2015) Bernard Lo   JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials

(2015) Iain J Marshall et al.   JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION

Trends in global clinical trial registration: an analysis of numbers of registered clinical trials in different parts of the world from 2004 to 2013

(2015) Roderik F Viergever et al.   BMJ Open

Avoidable waste of research related to inadequate methods in clinical trials

(2015) Y. Yordanov et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

Avoidable waste of research related to inadequate methods in clinical trials

(2015) Y. Yordanov et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research

(2014) Paul Glasziou et al.   LANCET

How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set

(2014) Iain Chalmers et al.   LANCET

Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste

(2014) Malcolm R Macleod et al.   LANCET

Poor Reliability between Cochrane Reviewers and Blinded External Reviewers When Applying the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool in Physical Therapy Trials

(2014) Susan Armijo-Olivo et al.   PLoS One

The Role of Gender in Scholarly Authorship

(2013) Jevin D. West et al.   PLoS One

Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials

(2009) Sylvain Mathieu   JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence

(2009) Iain Chalmers et al.   LANCET

Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated

(2008) John P. A. Ioannidis   EPIDEMIOLOGY

CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration

(2008) Sally Hopewell et al.   PLOS MEDICINE