4.7 Article

All States are Universal Catalysts in Quantum Thermodynamics

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW X
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.011061

关键词

-

资金

  1. UK EPSRC [EP/R00644X/1]
  2. PL NCN [PRELUDIUM 14 2017/27/N/ST2/01227]
  3. Royal Society URF
  4. EPSRC [EP/R00644X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quantum catalysis is a research field that demonstrates the remarkable property of multicopy states in catalyzing reactions within the framework of resource theory. It shows that resourceful states can serve as catalysts for all allowed transformations without the need for fine-tuning or very large-dimension catalysts.
Quantum catalysis is a fascinating concept that demonstrates how certain transformations can only become possible when given access to a specific resource that has to be returned unaffected. It was first discovered in the context of entanglement theory, and since then, it has been applied in a number of resource-theoretic frameworks, including quantum thermodynamics. Although, in that case, the necessary (and sometimes also sufficient) conditions on the existence of a catalyst are known, almost nothing is known about the precise form of the catalyst state required by the transformation. In particular, it is not clear whether it has to have some special properties or be finely tuned to the desired transformation. In this work, we describe a surprising property of multicopy states: We show that in resource theories governed by majorization, all resourceful states are catalysts for all allowed transformations. In quantum thermodynamics, this means that the so-called second laws of thermodynamics do not require a fine-tuned catalyst; rather, any state, given sufficiently many copies, can serve as a useful catalyst. These analytic results are accompanied by several numerical investigations that indicate that neither a multicopy form nor a very-large-dimension catalyst is required to activate most allowed transformations catalytically.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据