4.7 Editorial Material

Plant Pollen Grains: A Move Towards Green Drug and Vaccine Delivery Systems

期刊

NANO-MICRO LETTERS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s40820-021-00654-y

关键词

Pollens; Sporopollenin; Drug delivery; Vaccine delivery; Plant pollen grains; Microcapsule shells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pollen grains and plant spores have emerged as innovative biomaterials with potential applications in drug and vaccine delivery. The microcapsule shells made up of sporopollenin exhibit features such as uniform size, non-toxic nature, and resilience to both acids and alkalis, making them promising for microencapsulation and controlled drug delivery. The mucoadhesion attribute of sporopollenin to intestinal tissues also enhances the effectiveness of nutraceutical or drug delivery.
Pollen grains and plant spores have emerged as innovative biomaterials for various applications such as drug/vaccine delivery, catalyst support, and the removal of heavy metals. The natural microcapsules comprising spore shells and pollen grain are designed for protecting the genetic materials of plants from exterior impairments. Two layers make up the shell, the outer layer (exine) that comprised largely of sporopollenin, and the inner layer (intine) that built chiefly of cellulose. These microcapsule shells, namely hollow sporopollenin exine capsules have some salient features such as homogeneity in size, non-toxic nature, resilience to both alkalis and acids, and the potential to withstand at elevated temperatures; they have displayed promising potential for the microencapsulation and the controlled drug delivery/release. The important attribute of mucoadhesion to intestinal tissues can prolong the interaction of sporopollenin with the intestinal mucosa directing to an augmented effectiveness of nutraceutical or drug delivery. Here, current trends and prospects related to the application of plant pollen grains for the delivery of vaccines and drugs and vaccine are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据