4.6 Review

The Role of Mitochondrial Dysfunction and ER Stress in TDP-43 and C9ORF72 ALS

期刊

FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR NEUROSCIENCE
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2021.653688

关键词

C9orf72; TDP-43; calcium homeostasis; ALS; mitochondria; endoplasmic reticulum; UPR

资金

  1. Motor Neuron Disease Association [889-792]
  2. Oxford-BMS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by mislocalization and aggregation of specific proteins in the cytoplasm. Research indicates that endoplasmic reticulum stress and mitochondrial dysfunction play a central role in the pathogenesis of ALS, potentially serving as important therapeutic targets.
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease of the motor system with complex determinants, including genetic and non-genetic factors. Despite this heterogeneity, a key pathological signature is the mislocalization and aggregation of specific proteins in the cytoplasm, suggesting that convergent pathogenic mechanisms focusing on disturbances in proteostasis are important in ALS. In addition, many cellular processes have been identified as potentially contributing to disease initiation and progression, such as defects in axonal transport, autophagy, nucleocytoplasmic transport, ER stress, calcium metabolism, the unfolded protein response and mitochondrial function. Here we review the evidence from in vitro and in vivo models of C9ORF72 and TDP-43-related ALS supporting a central role in pathogenesis for endoplasmic reticulum stress, which activates an unfolded protein response (UPR), and mitochondrial dysfunction. Disruption in the finely tuned signaling between the ER and mitochondria through calcium ions may be a crucial trigger of mitochondrial deficits and initiate an apoptotic signaling cascade, thus acting as a point of convergence for multiple upstream disturbances of cellular homeostasis and constituting a potentially important therapeutic target.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据