4.7 Article

Growth behavior of short fatigue cracks in a unidirectional SiC fiber-reinforced titanium matrix composite under spectrum loading

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.102980

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51675266]
  3. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX18_0314]
  4. Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Aerospace Power System [numberCEPE2019004]
  5. Jiang Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds [2019K029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the growth rate of matrix crack and its influencing factors in metal matrix composites. The results showed that the growth rate of matrix crack decreases with the increase of the number of cycles, which is attributed to the decrease of stress intensity factor caused by decreased load exerted on the matrix.
In metal matrix composites, the propagation of matrix crack normally leads to load redistribution within the fiber and matrix. The variation of matrix load, on the other hand, affects the growth of the crack in the metal matrix. In this paper, an approach to predict the matrix crack growth rate of a unidirectional SiC fiber-reinforced titanium matrix composite (TMCs) during spectrum loading is developed. The matrix crack was regarded as a mode I central crack. The effects of crack closure and high load hysteresis caused by the variability of were considered. Based on the Forman model, the matrix crack growth rate was also obtained. The results show that the growth rate of matrix crack decreases with the increase of the number of cycles, which can be attributed to the decrease of the stress intensity factor of the matrix crack resulting from the decrease of the load exerted on the matrix. The decreased load of the matrix was caused by the increase of the fiber bridging stress and the redistribution of the stress within the composite when the matrix crack length increases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据