Review
Clinical Neurology
Sven Bamps, Vincent Raymaekers, Gert Roosen, Eric Put, Steven Vanvolsem, Salah-Eddine Achahbar, Sacha Meeuws, Maarten Wissels, Mark Plazier
Summary: This systematic review compared the outcomes between lateral surgical approaches (LLIF/XLIF) and posterior interbody fusion surgery (PLIF) for degenerative lumbar diseases. The results showed that lateral approaches had less blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and comparable functional outcomes. Complication rates did not significantly differ between the two approaches. Therefore, lateral surgical approaches are a safe and effective alternative to PLIF.
WORLD NEUROSURGERY
(2023)
Article
Orthopedics
Win Boonsirikamchai, Pochamana Phisalpapra, Chayanis Kositamongkol, Ekkapoj Korwutthikulrangsri, Monchai Ruangchainikom, Werasak Sutipornpalangkul
Summary: This study compared the cost-effectiveness and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and standard open posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in Thai patients with lumbar spondylosis. The results showed that although LLIF had a longer operative time, it had lower total lifetime cost. However, LLIF was not considered cost-effective in the context of Thailand.
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH
(2023)
Article
Clinical Neurology
Soichiro Masuda, Toshiki Fukasawa, Masato Takeuchi, Shunsuke Fujibayashi, Bungo Otsuki, Koichi Murata, Takayoshi Shimizu, Shuichi Matsuda, Koji Kawakami
Summary: This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) after lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (P/TLIF). The results showed that patients who underwent LLIF had a significantly lower risk of SSI compared with those who received P/TLIF. Additionally, patients who had received LLIF also had a lower risk of transfusion.
Article
Engineering, Biomedical
Sagar Umale, Narayan Yoganandan, Jamie L. Baisden, Hoon Choi, Shekar N. Kurpad
Summary: This study investigated the biomechanical effects of various lumbar interbody fusion techniques on the spine using a validated finite-element model. The results showed that bilateral posterior instrumentations (TLIF, PLIF, and CLIF/360) resulted in the greatest reduction in lumbar spine range of motion, with forces transmitted through the vertebrae and disc pressures increasing proportionally to the range of motion. The study provides valuable information for surgeons to make informed decisions when selecting fusion procedures based on biomechanical effects.
JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS
(2022)
Article
Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology
Lin Han, Yongheng Li, Zhiyong Li, Hongdao Ma, Chenfeng Wang, Qiang Chen, Xuhua Lu
Summary: This study aimed to investigate the effect of rod contouring on single-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgery using finite element (FE) method and retrospective study. The results showed that different rod curvature models had similar biomechanical behaviors in terms of range of motion, intersegmental rotation angle, and intradiscal pressure. However, the posterior tangent-based rod curvature model had a better distribution of fixation stress. Clinical data analysis also revealed a correlation between moderate rod curvature and positive rod curvature minus posterior tangent angle with better postoperative results.
FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
(2022)
Article
Clinical Neurology
Jinlei Chen, Dongliang Li, Ruirui Wang, Shuang Wang, Zhizhong Shang, Mingchuan Wang, Xin Wang
Summary: The perioperative use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for short-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion can reduce hospital stay, postoperative complications, intraoperative blood loss, hospital costs, and opioid consumption, while improving early postoperative pain and dysfunction.
WORLD NEUROSURGERY
(2022)
Article
Clinical Neurology
M. Alexander Crawford, M. Harry Lightsey, X. Grace Xiong, M. Brendan Striano, J. Alfred Pisano, J. Andrew Schoenfeld, K. Andrew Simpson
Summary: The study found that anterior lumbar interbody techniques are, on average, 173% more expensive than posterior procedures. Surgeon, invasiveness, and procedure time were identified as significant predictors of total cost.
CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY
(2021)
Article
Medicine, General & Internal
Yu Matsukura, Toshitaka Yoshii, Shingo Morishita, Kenichiro Sakai, Takashi Hirai, Masato Yuasa, Hiroyuki Inose, Atsuyuki Kawabata, Kurando Utagawa, Jun Hashimoto, Masaki Tomori, Ichiro Torigoe, Tsuyoshi Yamada, Kazuo Kusano, Kazuyuki Otani, Satoshi Sumiya, Fujiki Numano, Kazuyuki Fukushima, Shoji Tomizawa, Satoru Egawa, Yoshiyasu Arai, Shigeo Shindo, Atsushi Okawa
Summary: LLIF and PLIF/TLIF have similar surgical outcomes in patients with ASD, with LLIF showing a smaller sagittal vertical axis and lower rates of intraoperative blood loss and postoperative epidural hematoma in ASD patients compared to PLIF/TLIF procedures.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
(2021)
Article
Clinical Neurology
Wei Fan, Li-Xin Guo, Dan Zhao
Summary: This study compared the effects of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) on the dynamic responses of the fused lumbar spine to vertical whole body vibration (WBV). The results showed some differences in dynamic responses between PLIF and TLIF at the fused and adjacent levels.
WORLD NEUROSURGERY
(2021)
Article
Clinical Neurology
Marco D. Burkhard, Jose M. Spirig, Florian Wanivenhaus, Frederic Cornaz, Marie-Rosa Fasser, Jonas Widmer, Mazda Farshad
Summary: This study aimed to investigate the residual motion of cortical screw (CS) and pedicle screw (PS) constructs in various posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) techniques. The results showed that bl-PLIF and TLIF had low residual motion in both CS and PS constructs, while ul-PLIF resulted in increased motion. The fs-TLIF technique further reduced motion compared to fr-TLIF in both CS and PS constructs.
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
(2023)
Article
Clinical Neurology
Tetsuhiko Mimura, Takahiro Tsutsumimoto, Mutsuki Yui, Jun Takahashi, Shugo Kuraishi, Hiromichi Misawa
Summary: The incidence of adjacent segment pathology (ASP) following minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion (MI-PLIF) was significantly lower compared to conventional open PLIF surgery. MI-PLIF also showed more favorable clinical outcomes in terms of ASP development.
Article
Clinical Neurology
Hae-Dong Jang, Jae Chul Lee, Jong-Hyeon Seo, Young-Ho Roh, Sung-Woo Choi, Byung-Joon Shin
Summary: This study compared the outcomes of three surgical methods (LLIF, TLIF, and PLIF) for treating L4-L5 single-level spondylolisthesis. The results showed that compared to TLIF and PLIF, LLIF surgery had faster postoperative recovery, less blood loss, and better improvement in radiologic parameters.
WORLD NEUROSURGERY
(2022)
Article
Health Care Sciences & Services
Bin Zhang, Yuan Hu, Qingquan Kong, Pin Feng, Junlin Liu, Junsong Ma
Summary: For patients with adjacent segment disease (ASD) requiring decompression after lumbar fusion, oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior decompression (OLIF-PD) may be an alternative revision strategy. Compared with traditional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) revision surgery, OLIF-PD has similar clinical outcomes but with reduced operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, and complications. These findings suggest that OLIF-PD is a feasible option for ASD.
JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
(2023)
Article
Clinical Neurology
Conor P. Lynch, Elliot D. K. Cha, Augustus J. Rush, Caroline N. Jadczak, Shruthi Mohan, Cara E. Geoghegan, Kern Singh
Summary: In assessing the impact of bilateral versus unilateral interbody cages on outcomes for MIS TLIF procedures, patients achieved MCID at similar rates regardless of the use of unilateral or bilateral cages, despite some differences in preoperative status and arthrodesis rates.
Article
Clinical Neurology
Gang Liu, Weixi Liu, Danjie Jin, Penglei Yan, Zhicheng Yang, Ruiping Liu
Summary: This study compared the clinical effects of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) with conventional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). The results showed that ULIF was an effective surgical technique for lumbar interbody fusion. Compared with PLIF, ULIF had less blood loss, reduced inflammatory reaction, less tissue damage, and faster postoperative recovery.