4.7 Article

Use of a balanced dual cyclooxygenase-112 and 5-lypoxygenase inhibitor in experimental colitis

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 789, 期 -, 页码 152-162

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2016.07.033

关键词

Baicalin; Catechin; LTB-4; PGE-2; Apoptosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cyclooxygenase (COX) and 5-lipoxygenase (5-LOX) play an important role in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). We investigated the effects of flavocoxid, a dual COX/LOX inhibitor, in experimental colitis induced with either dinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (DNBS) or dextrane sulphate sodium (DSS) In the first model, colitis was induced in rats by a single intra-colonic instillation (25 mg in 0.8 ml 50% ethanol) of DNBS; after 24 h animals were randomized to receive orally twice a day, flavocoxid (10 mg/kg), zileuton (50 mg/kg), or celecoxib (5 mg/kg). Sham animals received 0.8 ml of saline by a single intracolonic instillation. Rats were killed 4 days after induction and samples were collected for analysis. In the second model, colitis was induced in rats by the administration of 8% DSS dissolved in drinking water; after 24 h animals were randomized to the same above reported treatments. Sham animals received standard drinking water. Rats were killed 5 days after induction and samples were collected for analysis. Flavocoxid, zileuton and celecoxib improved weight loss, reduced colonic myeloperoxydase activity, macroscopic and microscopic damage, and TNF-alpha serum levels. Flavocoxid and celecoxib also reduced malondialdheyde, 6-keto PGF(1 alpha), and PGE-2 levels while flavocoxid and zileuton decreased LTB-4 levels. In addition, flavocoxid treatment improved histological features and apoptosis as compared to zileuton and celecoxib; moreover only flavocoxid reduced TXB2, thus avoiding an imbalance in eicosanoids production. Our results show that flavocoxid has protective effect in IBDs and may represents a future safe treatment for inflammatory bowel diseases. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据