4.8 Article

Robot-induced hallucinations in Parkinson's disease depend on altered sensorimotor processing in fronto-temporal network

期刊

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 13, 期 591, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abc8362

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Center of Competence in Research (NCCR) Synapsy-The Synaptic Bases of Mental Diseases [51NF40-185897]
  2. FIS grant [PI18/01717]
  3. Generalitat de Catalunya [SLT008/18/00088]
  4. JSPS Fund for the Promotion of Joint International Research (Fostering Joint International Research) [17KK0003]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17KK0003] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study utilized robotics and neuroimaging to reveal the pathological mechanisms of hallucinations in Parkinson's disease patients, providing insights into predicting the presence of symptomatic hallucinations and their association with cognitive decline.
Hallucinations in Parkinson's disease (PD) are disturbing and frequent non-motor symptoms and constitute a major risk factor for psychosis and dementia. We report a robotics-based approach applying conflicting sensorimotor stimulation, enabling the induction of presence hallucinations ( PHs) and the characterization of a subgroup of patients with PD with enhanced sensitivity for conflicting sensorimotor stimulation and robot-induced PH. We next identify the fronto-temporal network of PH by combining MR-compatible robotics (and sensorimotor stimulation in healthy participants) and lesion network mapping (neurological patients without PD). This PH-network was selectively disrupted in an additional and independent cohort of patients with PD, predicted the presence of symptomatic PH, and associated with cognitive decline. These robotics-neuroimaging findings extend existing sensorimotor hallucination models to PD and reveal the pathological cortical sensorimotor processes of PH in PD, potentially indicating a more severe form of PD that has been associated with psychosis and cognitive decline.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据