4.8 Article

Paxbp1 controls a key checkpoint for cell growth and survival during early activation of quiescent muscle satellite cells

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2021093118

关键词

Paxbp1; muscle satellite cells; quiescence; ROS; cell growth

资金

  1. Hong Kong Research Grant Council [GRF16101517, C6018-19G, AoE/M-09/12, AoE/M-604/16, T13-605/18-W]
  2. Center for Systems Biology Human Health
  3. State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
  4. Shenzhen Bay Laboratory (Guangdong, China) [S201101002]
  5. Hong Kong Epigenome Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Paxbp1 is a key regulator controlling the transition of MuSCs from quiescence to cycling state, affecting the critical process of cell cycle reentry as well as cell growth and apoptosis. Partial rescue of the cell-cycle reentry defect caused by Paxbp1 deletion can be achieved by reducing ROS levels.
Adult mouse muscle satellite cells (MuSCs) are quiescent in uninjured muscles. Upon muscle injury, MuSCs exit quiescence, reenter the cell cycle to proliferate and self-renew, and then differentiate and fuse to drive muscle regeneration. However, it remains poorly understood how MuSCs transition from quiescence to the cycling state. Here, we report that Pax3 and Pax7 binding protein 1 (Paxbp1) controls a key checkpoint during this critical transition. Deletion of Paxbp1 in adult MuSCs prevented them from reentering the cell cycle upon injury, resulting in a total regeneration failure. Mechanistically, we found an abnormal elevation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in Paxbp1-null MuSCs, which induced p53 activation and impaired mTORC1 signaling, leading to defective cell growth, apoptosis, and failure in S-phase reentry. Deliberate ROS reduction partially rescued the cell-cycle reentry defect in mutant MuSCs. Our study reveals that Paxbp1 regulates a late cell-growth checkpoint essential for quiescent MuSCs to reenter the cell cycle upon activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据