4.8 Article

Genomic analyses provide comprehensive insights into the domestication of bast fiber crop ramie (Boehmeria nivea)

期刊

PLANT JOURNAL
卷 107, 期 3, 页码 787-800

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tpj.15346

关键词

Boehmeria nivea; genome; genomic variation; fiber; domestication

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31871678, 32001512]
  2. Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of China (CAAS-ASTIP-IBFC)
  3. National Modern Agroindustry Technology Research System [nycytx-19-E16]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through genome assembly and resequencing, a domestication analysis of cultivated and wild ramie was conducted, with findings indicating a focus on bast fiber traits during the domestication history of ramie.
Ramie (Boehmeria nivea) is an economically important natural fiber-producing crop that has been cultivated for thousands of years in China; however, the evolution of this crop remains largely unknown. Here, we report a ramie domestication analysis based on genome assembly and resequencing of cultivated and wild accessions. Two chromosome-level genomes representing wild and cultivated ramie were assembled de novo. Numerous structural variations between two assemblies, together with the genetic variations from population resequencing, constituted a comprehensive genomic variation map for ramie. Domestication analysis identified 71 high-confidence selective sweeps comprising 320 predicted genes, and 29 genes from sweeps were associated with fiber growth in the expression. In addition, we identified seven genetic loci associated with the fiber yield trait in the segregated population derived from the crossing of two assembled accessions, and two of which showed an overlap with the selective sweeps. These findings indicated that bast fiber traits were focused on during the domestication history of ramie. This study sheds light on the domestication of ramie and provides a valuable resource for biological and breeding studies of this important crop.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据