4.7 Article

Decomposition and temperature sensitivity of fine root and leaf litter of 43 mediterranean species

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 464, 期 1-2, 页码 453-465

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-021-04974-1

关键词

Q10; Chemical traits; C; N ratio; Lignin; N ratio; Nitrogen limitation

资金

  1. Universita degli Studi di Napoli Federico II within the CRUI-CARE Agreement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the chemical traits, decomposition rate, and temperature sensitivity of root and leaf litter of 43 Mediterranean species. Results showed that fine root litter had lower N content, higher lignin concentration, and slower decay rate compared to leaf litter. Q10 values were higher for fine root litter, positively correlated with lignin concentration.
Aims Data on the decomposition of fine roots are scarce for the Mediterranean basin. This work aims to compare chemical traits, decomposition rate, and temperature sensitivity (Q10) for root and leaf litter of 43 Mediterranean species. Methods We carried out a two-years litterbag decomposition experiment using 43 fine roots litter and leaf litter types incubated in laboratory conditions at three different temperatures, i.e. 4 degrees C, 14 degrees C, and 24 degrees C. Litter was characterized for carbon (C), nitrogen (N), lignin and cellulose concentration, C/N, and lignin/N ratios. Results Fine root litter had lower N content but higher lignin concentration, lignin/N, and C/N ratios compared to leaf litter. The decay rate of fine root litter was slower than leaf litter. For both tissues, the decay rate was negatively associated with lignin concentration, lignin/N, and C/N ratios but positively with N concentration. Q10 was higher for fine root than leaf litter, with a positive correlation with lignin while negative with N concentration. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate a higher Q10 accompanied by a slower decomposition rate of fine root litter compared to leaf litter in Mediterranean ecosystems. These results must be considered in modeling organic C at the ecosystem scale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据