4.7 Article

Full-scale simulation of self-propulsion for a free-running submarine

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0041334

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HUST: 2020JYCXJJ064]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study uses computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations to predict the self-propulsion performance of a full-scale submarine propelled by a high-skew propeller. Model- and full-scale simulations are conducted and compared, showing consistent results with minor discrepancies after adequate corrections. Discussions are provided on the differences between model- and full-scale self-propulsion results, including propeller performance, pressure distribution, boundary layer, and wake flow.
It is important to predict the self-propulsion performance of full-scale marine vessels during the design stage. With the development of high-performance computational techniques, full-scale ship-free running simulations focused on self-propulsion performance are receiving increased attention. This study presents the results of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations for a full-scale submarine propelled by a high-skew propeller. An in-house CFD code with the dynamic overset grid approach is used to simulate the rotational motion of the propeller. First, model- and full-scale simulations focused on submarine resistance and propeller open-water performance are conducted, enabling a systematic convergence study of the model. The self-propulsion performance is then predicted at the model scale, and comparisons with other available results show only small discrepancies. Finally, full-scale submarine self-propulsion simulations are conducted and the results are compared with those from the model-scale simulations with the addition of skin friction correction. Discussions on the differences between model- and full-scale self-propulsion results are presented including propeller performance, pressure distribution, boundary layer, and wake flow.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据