4.7 Article

Acceptability analysis and priority weight elicitation for interval multiplicative comparison matrices

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
卷 250, 期 2, 页码 628-638

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.09.010

关键词

Decision analysis; Interval multiplicative comparison matrix; Consistency; Acceptability; Logarithmic least square

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71572040, 71271188, 71272129]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LY15G010004]
  3. Humanities and Social Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [14YJC880069]
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Existing research on acceptability of pairwise interval comparison matrices focuses on acceptable consistency by controlling their inconsistency levels to within a certain threshold. However, a perfectly consistent but highly indeterminate interval comparison matrix can be unacceptable as it contains little (sometimes no) useful decision information. This paper first analyzes the current definition of acceptable consistency for interval multiplicative comparison matrices (IMCMs) and shows its technical deficiencies. We then introduce a new notion of acceptable IMCMs, considering both inconsistency and indeterminacy levels in IMCMs. A geometric-mean-based index is proposed to measure the indeterminacy ratio of an IMCM, and useful properties are derived for consistent IMCMs and acceptable IMCMs. An indeterminacy-ratio and geometric mean-based transformation equation is subsequently put forward to convert normalized acceptable interval multiplicative weights into an acceptable IMCM with consistency. By introducing an auxiliary constraint, a logarithmic least square model is established to generate interval multiplicative weights from acceptable IMCMs. A geometric-mean-based possibility degree formula is designed to compare and rank normalized interval multiplicative weights. Two numerical examples are presented to illustrate how to utilize the proposed framework. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. and Association of European Operational Research Societies (EURO) within the International Federation of Operational Research Societies (IFORS). All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据