4.4 Article

Effects of losartan and enalapril on serum uric acid and GFR in children with proteinuria

期刊

PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY
卷 36, 期 10, 页码 3211-3219

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00467-021-05045-4

关键词

Children; Chronic kidney disease (CKD); Hyperuricemia; Hypertension; Proteinuria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies have shown that losartan reduces serum uric acid levels in adults compared to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. A post hoc analysis comparing the effects of losartan and enalapril on reducing proteinuria in children found that losartan may have long-term beneficial effects on both serum uric acid and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).
Background Studies have shown that losartan reduces serum uric acid in adults, unlike angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. A previous study demonstrated that losartan and enalapril had comparable effects on proteinuria in children. Methods We conducted a post hoc analysis of results from a prospective trial in which the proteinuria-reducing effects of losartan and enalapril were compared. We have now evaluated (a) the effects of these medications on SUA in 248 children with proteinuria and (b) the correlation between changes in SUA and eGFR. Results SUA levels after 36 months were found to be increased when compared to baseline in both losartan and enalapril groups. The mean change in SUA from baseline was significantly different at 12 months between 23 hypertensive patients randomised to losartan (3.69% decrease [95% CI 11.31%, 3.93%]) and 24 randomised to enalapril (12.57% increase [95% CI 3.72%, 21.41%]), p = 0.007. This significant difference remained after 24, 30 and 36 months but was observed in the entire group of 248 patients only at 12 months. There was a statistically significant negative correlation between changes in SUA and changes in eGFR at each time point over 36 months. Conclusions Losartan may have long-term beneficial effects on SUA and eGFR in children with proteinuria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据