4.4 Article

Global genotype by environment trends in growth traits for Eucalyptus dunnii

期刊

NEW FORESTS
卷 53, 期 1, 页码 101-123

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11056-021-09846-1

关键词

Eucalyptus dunnii; GxE; Growth; Genetic correlations

类别

资金

  1. Innovation Connections grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated selected and native forest family seedlots of Eucalyptus dunnii in open-pollinated progeny trials in multiple countries and found high genetic correlations between growth traits, trials and ages. Results suggest that selection and deployment across trials in different countries is feasible, but further investigation is needed to understand genotype by environment interactions.
Eucalyptus dunnii Maiden (Dunn's white gum) is a fast-growing tall tree with a restricted natural distribution in south-east Australia and favorable wood properties for pulp production. In this study, selected and native forest family seedlots of E. dunnii were evaluated in 17 open-pollinated progeny trials located in Australia, Uruguay, China, Argentina, and Spain for diameter at breast height and total height between the ages of 1 and 7 years. The generality of the factor analytic approach was extended to accommodate unbalance in treatment effects and traits, by modelling each dimension of the genotype covariance matrix as a unique combination of location, age, and trait. Genetic correlations between the two growth traits, between trials and between ages were generally high with only five trials exhibiting average trial-trial correlations below 0.7, indicating genotype by environment interactions were low. Estimated individual seedlot repeatability varied from 0.04 to 0.18 for both traits. The results of this study show that selection and deployment across multiple trials within Australia, Uruguay, China, and Argentina is possible from a single breeding program of E. dunnii, however some environments will require further investigation to determine the drivers of the observed GxE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据