4.3 Review

Genetic causes of preimplantation embryo developmental failure

期刊

MOLECULAR REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 88, 期 5, 页码 338-348

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrd.23471

关键词

blastocyst; development; embryos; genes; implantation

资金

  1. 9.baby Family and Fertility Center, Bologna, Italy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Embryo development requires coordinated events at the molecular and cellular level, with multiple genes and regulatory pathways identified for each stage. Undisturbed and timely gene expression is crucial for successful development.
Embryo development requires orchestrated events, finely regulated at the molecular and cellular level by mechanisms which are progressively emerging from animal studies. With progress in genetic technologies-such as genome editing and single-cell RNA analysis-we can now assess embryo gene expression with increased precision and gain new insights into complex processes until recently difficult to explore. Multiple genes and regulative pathways have been identified for each developmental stage. We have learned that embryos with undisturbed and timely gene expression have higher chances of successful development. For example, selected genes are highly expressed during the first stages, being involved in cell adhesion, cell cycle, and regulation of transcription; other genes are instead crucial for lineage specification and therefore expressed at later stages. Due to ethical constraints, studies on human embryos remain scarce, mainly descriptive, and unable to provide functional evidence. This highlights the importance of animal studies as basic knowledge to test and appraise in a clinical context. In this review, we report on preimplantation development with a focus on genes whose impairment leads to developmental arrest. Preconceptional genetic screening could identify loss-of-function mutations of these genes; thereby, novel biomarkers of embryo quality could be adopted to improve diagnosis and treatment of infertility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据