4.7 Article

A novel intelligent fault diagnosis method of rolling bearing based on two-stream feature fusion convolutional neural network

期刊

MEASUREMENT
卷 176, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109226

关键词

Real-time bearing fault diagnosis; Convolutional neural network; Feature fusion; Particle swarm optimization; Support vector machine

资金

  1. Bosch Rexroth Endowment for Automation & Electrification Solutions of CDHK of Tongji University [0900165117]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFE0101400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a new bearing fault diagnosis model TSFFCNN-PSO-SVM, which extracts deep features using a parallel multi-channel structure of 1D-CNN and 2D-CNN, combined with feature fusion strategy to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce iteration and computational cost.
Previous bearing fault diagnosis models show either low accuracy or long iterations, which are not suitable for real-time production quality control scenarios lacking computing resources. In this paper, the Two-Stream Feature Fusion Convolutional Neural Network (TSFFCNN) is established. In-depth features are extracted from the proposed parallel multi-channel structure of 1D-CNN and 2D-CNN and then jointed by feature fusion strategy for a more reliable diagnostic effect. Besides, Particle Smarm Optimized-Support Vector Machine (PSO-SVM) is adopted for higher accuracy. Model?s structural parameters are well-configured for fewer iterations and less computational cost. The algorithm?s diagnostic effectiveness on the single and simulated compound fault is verified. Stationarity and synchronicity are conceptualized to prove the reliability. With accuracy, convergence iterations, and time consumption, the TSFFCNN-PSO-SVM model is comprehensively compared with other intelligent algorithms. The experimental results reveal that TSFFCNN-PSO-SVM can identify fault modes from vibration signals more accurately with fewer iterations at the same time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据