4.7 Article

Intraoperative irradiation for early breast cancer (ELIOT): long-term recurrence and survival outcomes from a single-centre, randomised, phase 3 equivalence trial

期刊

LANCET ONCOLOGY
卷 22, 期 5, 页码 597-608

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00080-2

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Italian Association for Cancer Research
  2. Jacqueline Seroussi Memorial Foundation for Cancer Research
  3. Umberto Veronesi Foundation
  4. American Italian Cancer Foundation
  5. Lombardy Region
  6. Italian Ministry of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The long-term results of the trial confirmed a higher rate of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence in the ELIOT group compared to the WBI group, while overall survival rates were similar between the two groups. ELIOT may be considered for selected low-risk patients.
Background In the randomised, phase 3 equivalence trial on electron intraoperative radiotherapy (ELIOT), accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with the use of intraoperative radiotherapy was associated with a higher rate of ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR) than whole-breast irradiation (WBI) in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Here, we aimed to examine the planned long-term recurrence and survival outcomes from the ELIOT trial. Methods This single-centre, randomised, phase 3 equivalence trial was done at the European Institute of Oncology (Milan, Italy). Eligible women, aged 48-75 years with a clinical diagnosis of a unicentric breast carcinoma with an ultrasound diameter not exceeding 25 mm, clinically negative axillary lymph nodes, and who were suitable for breast-conserving surgery, were randomly assigned (1:1) via a web-based system, with a random permuted block design (block size of 16) and stratified by clinical tumour size, to receive post-operative WBI with conventional fractionation (50 Gy given as 25 fractions of 2 Gy, plus a 10 Gy boost), or 21 Gy intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons (ELIOT) in a single dose to the tumour bed during surgery. The trial was open label and no-one was masked to treatment group assignment. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of IBTR. The trial was designed assuming a 5-year IBTR rate of 3% in the WBI group and equivalence of the two groups, if the 5-year IBTR rate in the ELIOT group did not exceed a 2middot5 times excess, corresponding to 7middot5%. Overall survival was the secondary endpoint. The main analysis was done by intention to treat. The cumulative incidence of IBTR events and overall survival were assessed at 5, 10, and 15 years of follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01849133. Findings Between Nov 20, 2000, and Dec 27, 2007, 1305 women were enrolled and randomly assigned: 654 to the WBI group and 651 to the ELIOT group. After a median follow-up of 12middot4 years (IQR 9middot7-14middot7), 86 (7%) patients developed IBTR, with 70 (11%) cases in the ELIOT group and 16 (2%) in the WBI group, corresponding to an absolute excess of 54 IBTRs in the ELIOT group (HR 4middot62, 95% CI 2middot68-7middot95, p<0middot0001). In the ELIOT group, the 5-year IBTR rate was 4middot2% (95% CI 2middot8-5middot9), the 10-year rate was 8middot1% (6middot1-10middot3), and the 15-year rate was 12middot6% (9middot8-15middot9). In the WBI group, the 5-year IBTR rate was 0middot5% (95% CI 0middot1-1middot3), the 10-year rate was 1middot1% (0middot5-2middot2), and the 15-year rate was 2middot4% (1middot4-4middot0). At final follow-up on March 11, 2019, 193 (15%) women had died from any cause, with no difference between the two groups (98 deaths in the ELIOT group vs 95 in the WBI group; HR 1middot03, 95% CI 0middot77-1middot36, p=0middot85). In the ELIOT group, the overall survival rate was 96middot8% (95% CI 95middot1-97middot9) at 5 years, 90middot7% (88middot2-92middot7) at 10 years, and 83middot4% (79middot7-86middot4) at 15 years; and in the WBI group, the overall survival rate was 96middot8% (95middot1-97middot9) at 5 years, 92middot7% (90middot4-94middot4) at 10 years, and 82middot4% (78middot5-85middot6) at 15 years. We did not collect long-term data on adverse events. Interpretation The long-term results of this trial confirmed the higher rate of IBTR in the ELIOT group than in the WBI group, without any differences in overall survival. ELIOT should be offered to selected patients at low-risk of IBTR. Funding Italian Association for Cancer Research, Jacqueline Seroussi Memorial Foundation for Cancer Research, Umberto Veronesi Foundation, American Italian Cancer Foundation, The Lombardy Region, and Italian Ministry of Health. C opyright (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据