4.7 Article

Natural convection of CuO-water nanofluid in a conventional oil/water separator cavity: Application to combined-cycle power plants

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2021.03.031

关键词

Natural convection; Cavity; Fin; Oil; water separator; Entropy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the natural convection of CuO-water nanoliquid in oil/water separator cavity, exploring the influences of Rayleigh number, Darcy number, and Hartmann number on heat transfer performance and entropy generation, and proposes a new equation for average Nusselt number.
The oily water from various sources in combined cycle power plants is collected in oil/water separator in which the oil separates from water due to the density difference. The idea of the presented geometry is taken from conventional oil/water separators. This paper studies the natural convection of the CuO-water nanoliquid in a rectangular cavity with fins attached to the insulated wall and porous media. Discretion of NavierStokes equations is done by Finite Element Method and assumptions are laminar, steady and incompressible flow. Heat transfer performance and entropy generation are investigated for distinct Rayleigh numbers (103-105), Darcy numbers (10-2-10-4), and Hartmann numbers (0, 10, 20). Different sizes of the fins are also studied to show consequences of fin size on heat transfer in cavity. This is the first time that these parameters and their impacts on Nusselt number and entropy generation are studied for a conventional oil/ water separator cavity. Corollaries demonstrate that increasing Rayleigh number and Darcy number improves heat transfer performance and average Nusselt number. Nevertheless, Hartmann number has a reverse effect with average Nusselt number. Finally, a new equation for average Nusselt number is developed with regard to Rayleigh number, Hartmann number, and Darcy number. (c) 2021 Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据