4.8 Review

Magnetism, Ultrasound, and Light-Stimulated Mesoporous Silica Nanocarriers for Theranostics and Beyond

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 143, 期 16, 页码 6025-6036

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c10098

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NIH RO1 GM135380]
  2. U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command [PR190949P1]
  3. National Science foundation [NSF-0830117]
  4. U.S. Defense Threat Reduction Agency [HDTRA1-13-1-0046]
  5. UCLA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reviews the intensive studies on stimuli-responsive multifunctional mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) in the past decade, focusing on the noninvasive, biologically usable external stimuli including magnetism, ultrasound, and light. It discusses the designs of mesopore capping systems and the advantages and drawbacks of the nanoplatforms' responses to the various stimuli, emphasizing on recent advances and future research directions for clinical applications.
Stimuli-responsive multifunctional mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) have been studied intensively during the past decade. A large variety of mesopore capping systems have been designed, initially to show that it could be done and later for biomedical applications such as drug delivery and imaging. On-command release of cargo molecules such as drugs from the pores can be activated by a variety of stimuli. This paper focuses on three noninvasive, biologically usable external stimuli: magnetism, ultrasound, and light. We survey the variety of MSNs that have been and are being used and assess capping designs and the advantages and drawbacks of the nanoplatforms' responses to the various stimuli. We discuss important recent advances, their basic mechanisms, and their requirements for stimulation. On the basis of our survey, we identify fundamental challenges and suggest future directions for research that will unleash the full potential of these fascinating nanosystems for clinical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据