4.5 Article

B-cell-intrinsic function of TAPP adaptors in controlling germinal center responses and autoantibody production in mice

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 47, 期 2, 页码 280-290

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.201646596

关键词

Antibodies; Autoimmunity; B cells; Cellular activation; Signal transduction

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP93771]
  2. MRC [MC_U127015387, MC_U127070193, MC_UU_12016/2, MC_EX_G0802532] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12016/2, MC_U127015387, MC_U127070193, MC_EX_G0802532] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Control of B-cell signal transduction is critical to prevent production of pathological autoantibodies. Tandem PH domain containing proteins (TAPPs) specifically bind PI(3,4)P2, a phosphoinositide product generated by PI 3-kinases and the phosphatase SHIP. TAPP KI mice bearing PH domain-inactivating mutations in both TAPP1 and TAPP2 genes, uncoupling them from PI(3,4) P2, exhibit increased BCR-induced activation of the kinase Akt and develop lupus-like characteristics including anti-DNA antibodies and deposition of immune complexes in kidneys. Here, we find that TAPP KI mice develop chronic germinal centers (GCs) with age and show abnormal expression of B-cell activation and memory markers. Upon immunization with T-dependent Ag, TAPP KI mice develop functional but abnormally large GCs, associated with increased GC B-cell survival. Disruption of chronic GCs in TAPP KI mice by deletion of the costimulatory molecule ICOS abrogate anti-DNA and anti-nuclear antibody production in TAPP KI mice, indicating an essential role for GCs. Moreover, TAPP KI B cells are sufficient to drive chronic GC responses and recapitulate the autoimmune phenotype in BM chimeric mice. Our findings demonstrate a B-cell-intrinsic role of TAPP-PI(3,4) P2 interaction in regulating GC responses and autoantibody production and suggest that uncontrolled Akt activity in B cells can drive autoimmunity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据