4.5 Article

Genomic complexity of urothelial bladder cancer revealed in urinary cfDNA

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 24, 期 8, 页码 1167-1174

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.281

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cancer Research UK
  2. University of Birmingham
  3. Birmingham & The Black Country
  4. Birmingham Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre
  5. West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory
  6. Innovate-UK [101032]
  7. West Midlands North Comprehensive Local Research Network
  8. West Midlands South Comprehensive Local Research Network

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Urothelial bladder cancers (UBCs) have heterogeneous clinical characteristics that are mirrored in their diverse genomic profiles. Genomic profiling of UBCs has the potential to benefit routine clinical practice by providing prognostic utility above and beyond conventional clinicopathological factors, and allowing for prediction and surveillance of treatment responses. Urinary DNAs representative of the tumour genome provide a promising resource as a liquid biopsy for non-invasive genomic profiling of UBCs. We compared the genomic profiles of urinary cellular DNA and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from the urine with matched diagnostic formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour DNAs for 23 well-characterised UBC patients. Our data show urinary DNAs to be highly representative of patient tumours, allowing for detection of recurrent clinically actionable genomic aberrations. Furthermore, a greater aberrant load (indicative of tumour genome) was observed in cfDNA over cellular DNA (P<0.001), resulting in a higher analytical sensitivity for detection of clinically actionable genomic aberrations (P<0.04) when using cfDNA. Thus, cfDNA extracted from the urine of UBC patients has a higher tumour genome burden and allows greater detection of key genomic biomarkers (90%) than cellular DNA from urine (61%) and provides a promising resource for robust whole-genome tumour profiling of UBC with potential to influence clinical decisions without invasive patient interventions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据