4.0 Article

Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy in Livedoid Vasculopathy: Retrospective Observation of Clinical Outcome and Patient's Activity Level

期刊

JOURNAL OF CUTANEOUS MEDICINE AND SURGERY
卷 25, 期 5, 页码 504-510

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/12034754211003525

关键词

livedoid vasculopathy; intravenous immunoglobulin; ulceration; livedo reticularis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

After IVIG treatment in LV patients, complete remission of symptoms was observed in 68% of patients, with significant improvements in pain and limitations of daily activities, and 92% of patients showed good tolerability to IVIG.
Background Livedoid vasculopathy (LV) is a rare disease characterized by livedo racemosa, atrophie blanche, ulcerations, and severe pain. Low molecular weight heparins and rivaroxaban can be used in LV-patients. In addition, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) have been described as treatment-option. Objectives Objective was to investigate the therapeutic effect of IVIG on ulcer, pain and restrictions in daily life. Methods Thirty-two LV-patients who received IVIG at the Department of Dermatology Tubingen between 01/2014 and 06/2019 were identified. Twenty-five of these patients were available for further follow up and were included in the study. Patients were interviewed using a questionnaire focusing on the course of the disease, symptoms, and subjective response to IVIG-treatment. Results Twenty-five patients were included in the study (mean follow up: 28.9 months). Patients received an average of 6.8 cycles (range 1-45) of IVIG during the observed period. Significant improvements were seen regarding skin findings, pain, and limitation of daily activities. Complete remission of symptoms was observed in 68% of patients. Good tolerability of IVIG was shown in 92%. Conclusions A good therapy response regarding ulceration, pain, and daily life restrictions with good tolerability was demonstrated for IVIG (2 g/kg bodyweight over 5 days).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据