4.6 Article

Tensor non-Gaussianity in chiral scalar-tensor theories of gravity

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/03/073

关键词

inflation; non-gaussianity; primordial gravitational waves (theory); physics of the early universe

资金

  1. ASI Grant [2016-24-H.0]
  2. COSMOS network through the ASI (Italian Space Agency) [2016-24-H.0, 2016-24-H.1-2018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper investigates inflation within chiral scalar-tensor theories of gravity, extending by including parity-violating operators. The study analyzes the effects of parity-violation on primordial tensor non-Gaussianity.
Violation of parity symmetry in the gravitational sector, which manifests into unequal left and right circular polarization states of primordial gravitational waves, represents a way to test high-energy modifications to general relativity. In this paper we study inflation within recently proposed chiral scalar-tensor theories of gravity, that extend Chern-Simons gravity by including parity-violating operators containing first and second derivatives of the non-minimally coupled scalar (inflaton) field. Given the degeneracy between different parity-violating theories at the level of the power spectrum statistics, we make a detailed analysis of the parity violation on primordial tensor non-Gaussianity. We show, with an explicit computation, that no new contributions arise in the graviton bispectra if the couplings in the new operators are constant in a pure de Sitter phase. On the other hand, if the coupling functions are time-dependent during inflation, the tensor bispectra acquire non-vanishing contributions from the parity-breaking operators even in the exact de Sitter limit, with maximal signal in the squeezed and equilateral configurations. We also comment on the consistency relation of the three-point function of tensor modes in this class of models and discuss prospects of detecting parity-breaking signatures through Cosmic Microwave Background B-mode bispectra.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据