标题
More than half of systematic reviews have relevant core outcome sets
作者
关键词
Core outcome sets, Outcomes, Systematic reviews, Matching, Scope, Relevance
出版物
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
出版商
Elsevier BV
发表日期
2021-05-09
DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.04.019
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 6th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
- (2021) Elizabeth Gargon et al. PLoS One
- Outcome choice and definition in systematic reviews leads to few eligible studies included in meta-analyses: a case study
- (2020) Ian J. Saldanha et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- The SOLAR (Standardized Outcomes Linking Across StakeholdeRs) system and hub and spokes model for direct core outcome measures in healthcare and its relation to GRADE
- (2020) Holger J. Schünemann et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Core outcome sets through the healthcare ecosystem: the case of type 2 diabetes mellitus
- (2020) Susanna Dodd et al. Trials
- A systematic review finds core outcome set uptake varies widely across different areas of health
- (2020) Karen L. Hughes et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Assessing the relevance and uptake of core outcome sets (an agreed minimum collection of outcomes to measure in research studies) in Cochrane systematic reviews: a review
- (2020) Paula R Williamson et al. BMJ Open
- Navigating the landscape of core outcome set development in dermatology
- (2019) Cecilia AC. Prinsen et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY
- Assessing the impact of a research funder’s recommendation to consider core outcome sets
- (2019) Karen L. Hughes et al. PLoS One
- Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
- (2019) Elizabeth Gargon et al. PLoS One
- Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries
- (2018) Katherine Davis et al. PLoS One
- Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
- (2018) Elizabeth Gargon et al. PLoS One
- Clinical trials and systematic reviews addressing similar interventions for the same condition do not consider similar outcomes to be important: a case study in HIV/AIDS
- (2017) Ian J. Saldanha et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey
- (2016) Sarah L. Gorst et al. PLoS One
- Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps
- (2016) Sarah L. Gorst et al. PLoS One
- Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research
- (2014) Paul Glasziou et al. LANCET
- Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider
- (2012) Paula R Williamson et al. Trials
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started