4.7 Article

Amide-based deep eutectic solvents containing LiFSI and NaFSI salts as superionic electrolytes for supercapacitor applications

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 154, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0048392

关键词

-

资金

  1. Le Studium Loire Valley Institute for Advanced Studies
  2. Region Centre Val de Loire through the Obama project under Lavoisier II

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces two deep eutectic solvents as electrolytes for activated carbon electrochemical double-layer capacitors, showing promising electrochemical performance at 25 degrees C. These electrolytes exhibit a large electrochemical window, good thermal stability, and moderate viscosity, surpassing standard organic electrolytes in terms of ionic conductivity.
This work proposes two deep eutectic solvents (DESs) based on lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide and sodium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide together with N-methylacetamide and formamide as electrolytes for activated carbon (AC) electrochemical double-layer capacitors (EDLCs) at 25 degrees C. The formulated DESs exhibit a large electrochemical window (Delta E > 2.5 V), good thermal stability (similar to 150 degrees C) and ionic conductivity (3-4 mS cm(-1)), and moderate viscosity (11.3 mPa s). Through the Vogel-Tamman-Vulcher fitting equation, the evolution of pseudo-energy activation was delineated with respect to the nature of the H-bond donor or alkali salt. These electrolytes present a superionic character gleaned from the Walden classification, and their ionicity exceeds that of standard organic electrolytes based on similar alkali salts. The performance of the AC-based EDLC was assessed by cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and galvanostatic charge/discharge, yielding 140 F g(-1) with an 8% capacity retention during 200 h of floating. Based on the physicochemical properties and electrochemical performance of these DESs, they represent a promising green-alternative electrolyte for supercapacitor applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据