Potential evaluation of different intercropping remediation modes based on remediation efficiency and economic benefits - a case study of arsenic-contaminated soil

Hyperaccumulator-cash crop intercropping remediation is a research hotspot for heavy metal contaminated farmland, but few studies evaluated its feasibility based on practice. Field experiments and survey statistics were conducted to obtain parameters of Pteris vittata-Citrus reticulata/Zea mays intercropping, and potential of intercropping remediation was evaluated based on remediation efficiency and economic benefits. The results showed that intercropping hyperaccumulator with cash crop (especially herbs) had a certain negative effect on remediation efficiency because of the influence on planting density and harvest times of hyperaccumulator; while trees could partly alleviate this effect. Until achieving the predetermined target, the net remediation cost of P. vittata-Z. mays was 18.2 $/g As, followed by P. vittata monoculture (13.3 $/g) and P. vittata-C. reticulata (8.6 $/g). Based on the proposed evaluation model, nealy half of the P. vittata intercropping modes had low economic benefits, insufficient to compensate the cost of sacrificing remediation efficiency. Based on the data from two soil remediation projects, when net income of cash crops intercropped with As-hyperaccumulators exceeded 5865/1607 $/hm(2) (herbs/trees), the economic benefit of intercropping will be relatively obvious. Therefore, cash crops should be considered from three aspects: planting conditions, spatial allocation and economic benefits. Novelty statement: This work analyzed remediation efficiency and economic benefits of intercropping remediation. An economic benefit evaluation model was established to evaluate intercropping remediation modes. The selection principle and net income threshold of cash crops in intercropping was put forward for the first time. [GRAPHICS] .

Automated summary

Intercropping remediation using hyperaccumulators with cash crops is a research hotspot for heavy metal contaminated farmland, but it was found to have negative effects on remediation efficiency. Trees can partly alleviate this effect. Nearly half of the intercropping modes showed low economic benefits that couldn't compensate for the cost of sacrificing remediation efficiency.