4.6 Article

Cold rolling force model of nuclear power zirconium alloy based on Particle Swarm Optimization

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-021-07210-3

关键词

Cold rolling; Zr-4 alloy; Rolling force model; Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project of China [2019ZX06002001-004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the cold rolling force model of nuclear power Zr-4 alloy, obtaining the cold rolling deformation resistance model and friction coefficient model using the PSO algorithm. A simplified method of the external friction stress state coefficient model based on global variables is proposed. Industrial tests showed an average prediction accuracy of 95.36%, effectively guiding the rolling control of the cold rolling production process.
The rolling force model is the core of rolling model, and the prediction accuracy of the Zr-4 alloy cold rolling force model directly affects the control accuracy of the thickness and shape of the Zr-4 alloy strip. In this paper, the cold rolling force model of the nuclear power Zr-4 alloy is studied based on the adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm. The cold rolling deformation resistance model of the nuclear power Zr-4 alloy was obtained by field actual sampling and tensile test. The friction coefficient model of the nuclear power Zr-4 alloy was studied based on the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm according to the field measured rolling force value. According to the Hill model, a simplified method of external friction stress state coefficient model based on global variables is proposed by using the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm. Finally, the cold rolling force model of the Zr-4 alloy is established. Industrial test proves that the average cold rolling force prediction accuracy of the nuclear power Zr-4 alloy is 95.36%, which can effectively guide the rolling control of the nuclear power Zr-4 alloy cold rolling production process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据