4.4 Review

A state-of-the-art review on topologies and control techniques of solid-state transformers for electric vehicle extreme fast charging

期刊

IET POWER ELECTRONICS
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 1560-1576

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1049/pel2.12141

关键词

-

资金

  1. UREP grant from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of the Qatar Foundation) [27-021-2-010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reviews the requirements, specifications, and design criteria of EV chargers for high power applications, discussing key barriers of using traditional low frequency transformers and proposing potential solutions. It also describes various SST-based converter topologies and their control strategies for EV fast-charging stations.
Electrical vehicle (EV) technology has gained popularity due to its higher efficiency, less maintenance, and lower dependence on fossil fuels. However, a longer charging time is a significant barrier to its complete adaptation. Solid state transformer (SST) based extreme fast charging schemes have emerged as an appealing idea with an ability to provide a refuelling capability analogous to that of gasoline vehicles. Therefore, this paper reviews the EV charger requirements, specifications, and design criteria for high power applications. At first, the key barriers of using a traditional low frequency transformer (LFT) are discussed, and potential solutions are suggested by replacing the conventional LFT with high frequency SST at extreme fast-charging (XFC) stations. Then, various SST-based converter topologies and their control for EV fast-charging stations are described. The reviewed control strategies are compared while considering several factors such as harmonics, voltage drop under varying loading conditions, dc offset load unbalances, overloads, and protection against system disturbances. Furthermore, the realization of SST for EV charging is comprehensively discussed, which facilitates understanding the current challenges, based on which potential solutions are also suggested.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据