4.5 Article

Design and verification of the in-vessel cooling water system for the EAST lower tungsten divertor

期刊

FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN
卷 165, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112254

关键词

EAST; Divertor; Plasma facing components; Cooling water system; FEA; Prototype

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0402500, 2017YFE0300400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces the design and test results of the in-vessel cooling water system for the lower divertor of EAST, proving that the design is rational and meets the requirements, providing support for the next design phase.
The Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) aims at more than 400 s long-pulse H-mode operations with a full metal wall and a divertor heat load of 10 MW/m(2) in the next machine operation phase. However, currently the lower graphite divertor heat handling capability is restricted to less than 2 MW/m(2). Therefore, the lower divertor and lower corresponding components are demanded to be upgraded. The in-vessel plasma facing components (PFCs) cooling water system (CWS) providing water to the lower divertor is important, which requires to meet cooling requirement according to the related heat load of PFCs. This paper describes the latest EAST in-vessel CWS. The conceptual design procedure of the in-vessel CWS for EAST lower tungsten divertor is detailed presented. Hydraulic and structure analysis are performed. The pressure drop is within acceptable range of design requirement. The resultant stress and displacement meet the requirement of the design code and standard. According to the test of EAST lower divertor in-vessel CWS prototype, the test and simulation data are provided to prove that the design is rational and the minor difference of structure and weld have a little effect on water pressure drop. These results show that the design of the in-vessel CWS for EAST lower divertor at present meets the requirements, which give a strong support to the next design phase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据