4.3 Article

Spatiotemporal distribution of Flavobacterium psychrophilum and ayu Plecoglossus altivelis in rivers revealed by environmental DNA analysis

期刊

FISHERIES SCIENCE
卷 87, 期 3, 页码 321-330

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s12562-021-01510-z

关键词

Ayu Plecoglossus altivelis; Bacterial cold-water disease; Environmental DNA (eDNA); Flavobacterium psychrophilum; Seasonal dynamics

资金

  1. Ito Scholarship Foundation
  2. Tohnetsu-Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through quantitative analysis of environmental DNA, the seasonal dynamics of ayu and Flavobacterium psychrophilum were identified, revealing a strong negative correlation between them. Ayu is more susceptible to F. psychrophilum infection during early summer and fall when undergoing up- and downmigration, respectively.
Outbreaks of bacterial cold-water disease (BCWD), caused by Flavobacterium psychrophilum, are widespread in Japan, especially among ayu Plecoglossus altivelis. There are few investigations of F. psychrophilum in river water, and its seasonal distribution has not been clarified. We aimed to identify the spatiotemporal dynamics of F. psychrophilum and ayu to provide information that is useful for establishing a countermeasure for BCWD. Quantitative analysis of environmental DNA (eDNA) was used to clarify the year-round dynamics of ayu and F. psychrophilum. We sampled river water from the Nagara and Ibi rivers in Japan, and conducted monthly water sampling and eDNA quantification. Changes in the eDNA concentration of ayu were consistent with the known life histories of the fish. There was a strong negative correlation between the eDNA concentration of F. psychrophilum and water temperature, suggesting a strong dependence of F. psychrophilum dynamics in the river on water temperature. Furthermore, relatively high eDNA concentrations were recorded for both organisms in early summer and fall, suggesting that ayu is infected with F. psychrophilum during these seasons when experiencing up- and downmigration, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据