Conceptual and methodological issues in estimating the success of ecological restoration
出版年份 2021 全文链接
标题
Conceptual and methodological issues in estimating the success of ecological restoration
作者
关键词
Achieved restoration index, Activerestoration, Meta-analysis, Passive restoration, Remaining recovery
出版物
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
Volume 123, Issue -, Pages 107362
出版商
Elsevier BV
发表日期
2021-01-23
DOI
10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- The Orchard Plot: Cultivating a Forest Plot for Use in Ecology, Evolution and Beyond
- (2020) Shinichi Nakagawa et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- A primer on choosing goals and indicators to evaluate ecological restoration success
- (2019) Karel Prach et al. RESTORATION ECOLOGY
- Prioritizing sites for ecological restoration based on ecosystem services
- (2018) Francisco A. Comín et al. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY
- Restoration and repair of Earth's damaged ecosystems
- (2018) Holly P. Jones et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
- Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis
- (2018) Jessica Gurevitch et al. NATURE
- lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models
- (2017) Alexandra Kuznetsova et al. Journal of Statistical Software
- Ecosystem restoration strengthens pollination network resilience and function
- (2017) Christopher N. Kaiser-Bunbury et al. NATURE
- Anthropogenic ecosystem disturbance and the recovery debt
- (2017) David Moreno-Mateos et al. Nature Communications
- Grassland habitat restoration: lessons learnt from long term monitoring of Swanworth Quarry, UK, 1997–2014
- (2017) Barbara Maria Smith et al. PeerJ
- Ecological restoration success is higher for natural regeneration than for active restoration in tropical forests
- (2017) Renato Crouzeilles et al. Science Advances
- What's wrong with novel ecosystems, really?
- (2016) James R. Miller et al. RESTORATION ECOLOGY
- Restoration, Reintroduction, and Rewilding in a Changing World
- (2016) Richard T. Corlett TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
- A global meta-analysis on the ecological drivers of forest restoration success
- (2016) Renato Crouzeilles et al. Nature Communications
- Quantifying the impacts of ecological restoration on biodiversity and ecosystem services in agroecosystems: A global meta-analysis
- (2015) María Paula Barral et al. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
- Bias and correction for the log response ratio in ecological meta-analysis
- (2015) Marc J. Lajeunesse ECOLOGY
- Ecosystem response to interventions: lessons from restored and created wetland ecosystems
- (2015) David Moreno-Mateos et al. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY
- Optimal Conservation Outcomes Require Both Restoration and Protection
- (2015) Hugh P. Possingham et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Conducting Meta-Analyses inRwith themetaforPackage
- (2015) Wolfgang Viechtbauer Journal of Statistical Software
- Restoration Enhances Wetland Biodiversity and Ecosystem Service Supply, but Results Are Context-Dependent: A Meta-Analysis
- (2014) Paula Meli et al. PLoS One
- Recovery and resilience of tropical forests after disturbance
- (2014) Lydia E. S. Cole et al. Nature Communications
- Hurdles and Opportunities for Landscape-Scale Restoration
- (2013) M. H. M. Menz et al. SCIENCE
- The Robustness and Restoration of a Network of Ecological Networks
- (2012) M. J. O. Pocock et al. SCIENCE
- Structural and Functional Loss in Restored Wetland Ecosystems
- (2012) David Moreno-Mateos et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities
- (2011) James M. Bullock et al. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
- Colonization Credit in Restored Wet Heathlands
- (2009) Sara Cristofoli et al. RESTORATION ECOLOGY
- Enhancement of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services by Ecological Restoration: A Meta-Analysis
- (2009) J. M. R. Benayas et al. SCIENCE
- Spontaneous Succession versus Technical Reclamation in the Restoration of Disturbed Sites
- (2008) Karel Prach et al. RESTORATION ECOLOGY
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started