4.7 Article

BAPTA, a calcium chelator, neuroprotects injured neurons in vitro and promotes motor recovery after spinal cord transection in vivo

期刊

CNS NEUROSCIENCE & THERAPEUTICS
卷 27, 期 8, 页码 919-929

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cns.13651

关键词

calcium; locomotor recovery; neuronal apoptosis; oxidative stress; spinal cord injury

资金

  1. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety [19182MFDS408, 20182MFDS423]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates that local/immediate administration of the calcium chelator BAPTA is strongly neuroprotective following severe spinal cord injury. The use of BAPTA inhibited neuronal apoptosis and reactive oxygen species generation, leading to improved preservation of electrophysiological function and better behavioral recovery.
Aim Despite animal evidence of a role of calcium in the pathogenesis of spinal cord injury, several studies conducted in the past found calcium blockade ineffective. However, those studies involved oral or parenteral administration of Ca++ antagonists. We hypothesized that Ca++ blockade might be effective with local/immediate application (LIA) at the time of neural injury. Methods In this study, we assessed the effects of LIA of BAPTA (1,2-bis (o-aminophenoxy) ethane-N, N, N ', N'-tetraacetic acid), a cell-permeable highly selective Ca++ chelator, after spinal cord transection (SCT) in mice over 4 weeks. Effects of BAPTA were assessed behaviorally and with immunohistochemistry. Concurrently, BAPTA was submitted for the first time to multimodality assessment in an in vitro model of neural damage as a possible spinal neuroprotectant. Results We demonstrate that BAPTA alleviates neuronal apoptosis caused by physical damage by inhibition of neuronal apoptosis and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation. This translates to enhanced preservation of electrophysiological function and superior behavioral recovery. Conclusion This study shows for the first time that local/immediate application of Ca++ chelator BAPTA is strongly neuroprotective after severe spinal cord injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据