4.7 Review

The efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in cold cancers and future perspectives

期刊

CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 226, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2021.108707

关键词

Programmed death-1 receptor (PD-1); Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1); Tumor microenvironment (TME); Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI); Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); Mismatch repair; Microsatellite instability (MSI); Cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen-4& nbsp; (CTLA-4)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interaction between PD-L1 and PD-1 is crucial for immune evasion in cancers, with PD-L1 positivity generally associated with higher responses to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) but also poor prognosis. Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is aggressive, but shows meaningful responses to ICI. Combining anti-PD-1/PD-L1 with immune modulatory drugs has shown significant clinical benefits.
Colorectal cancer (CRC), and breast, ovarian, pancreatic and prostate cancers are generally considered as low immune-reactive cancers that represent either limited infiltration of immune cells or extensive infiltration of immunosuppressive T cells. Interaction between programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) with programmed death-1 receptor (PD-1) is important for immune evasion. Tumors positive for PD-L1 generally show higher responses to the immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI); however, the high presence of PD-L1 in a tumor is a predictor of poor prognosis. Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer, but responses to the ICI is meaningful. It seems that in a tumor both the PD-L1 expression and TIL infiltration is required for improving responses to the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. Combination of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 with immune modulatory drugs, such as C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4), poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) or transforming growth factor (TGF)-? inhibitors has shown meaningful clinical benefits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据