4.7 Article

Factors affecting the rapid changes of protein under short-term heat stress

期刊

BMC GENOMICS
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-021-07560-y

关键词

Heat stress; Posttranscriptional regulation; Codon usage; AAG frequency; Wheat

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0101802, 2017YFD0300202-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the factors influencing changes in protein expression during early stages of heat stress were analyzed. Transcription, codon usage, and amino acid frequency were found to be the main drivers of protein expression changes, with transcription playing a larger role at 40 degrees Celsius. Additionally, the usage of codon AAG was closely related to rapid protein alterations under heat stress.
Background Protein content determines the state of cells. The variation in protein abundance is crucial when organisms are in the early stages of heat stress, but the reasons affecting their changes are largely unknown. Results We quantified 47,535 mRNAs and 3742 proteins in the filling grains of wheat in two different thermal environments. The impact of mRNA abundance and sequence features involved in protein translation and degradation on protein expression was evaluated by regression analysis. Transcription, codon usage and amino acid frequency were the main drivers of changes in protein expression under heat stress, and their combined contribution explains 58.2 and 66.4% of the protein variation at 30 and 40 degrees C (20 degrees C as control), respectively. Transcription contributes more to alterations in protein content at 40 degrees C (31%) than at 30 degrees C (6%). Furthermore, the usage of codon AAG may be closely related to the rapid alteration of proteins under heat stress. The contributions of AAG were 24 and 13% at 30 and 40 degrees C, respectively. Conclusion In this study, we analyzed the factors affecting the changes in protein expression in the early stage of heat stress and evaluated their influence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据