4.7 Review

To mix or not to mix gene pools for threatened species management? Few studies use genetic data to examine the risks of both actions, but failing to do so leads disproportionately to recommendations for separate management

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
卷 256, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109072

关键词

Conservation management; Gene flow; Inbreeding depression; Outbreeding depression; Genetic diversity; Risk assessment; Population genetics

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Early Career Researcher Award [DE180100854]
  2. ARC [LP160100482]
  3. University of Canberra, Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP, Victoria)
  4. Diversity Arrays Technology
  5. Zoos Victoria
  6. Environment, Planning & Sustainable Development Directorate (ACT Government)
  7. Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (Western Australia)
  8. Monash University
  9. Australian Research Council [DE180100854, LP160100482] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Small, isolated populations face risks of genetic variation loss and inbreeding, which can increase their risk of extinction. Augmenting gene flow can help alleviate these issues. However, many studies do not consider genetic risks in their management recommendations, and those that do often recommend gene-pool mixing over separate management when considering inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression.
Many small, isolated populations lose genetic variation and suffer inbreeding, increasing their extinction risk. Augmenting gene flow may alleviate these issues if populations are compatible to mix. Accordingly, recommendations for genetic management should weigh the risk of allowing populations to remain small and separate (e.g. inbreeding depression) against augmenting gene flow through gene-pool mixing (e.g. outbreeding depression). To understand how studies examine the risks of alternative management actions, we reviewed the genetic analyses conducted and evidence used to inform their recommendations. Our review analysed 626 studies that discussed the management of small, isolated populations, and for a subset of 198 studies, we extracted details of the risk-assessment, genetic analyses, and recommendations made. Approximately 56% of studies did not refer to any genetic risks when making management recommendations. While separate management was the most common recommendation overall, studies that considered both inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression were more likely to recommend gene-pool mixing than separate management. The genetic data collected generally offer the potential for evidence-based decisions about the risks posed by different management options, yet our analyses suggest that recommendations were often based on limited use of evidence, creating risks to the effective management of threatened species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据