4.7 Article

Adaptive strategy in differential evolution via explicit exploitation and exploration controls

期刊

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
卷 107, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107494

关键词

Adaptive strategy; Explicit exploitation and exploration controls; Differential evolution; Evolutionary algorithm; Numerical optimization

资金

  1. City University of Hong Kong under a SRG Grant [7004710]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61671485]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a new strategy adaptation method that separates multiple strategies and uses them according to demand, balancing exploitation and exploration needs and adaptively using exploitative or explorative strategies in the adaptive stage, achieving better performance.
Existing multi-strategy adaptive differential evolution (DE) commonly involves trials of multiple strategies and then rewards better-performing ones with more resources. However, the trials of an exploitative or explorative strategy may result in over-exploitation or over-exploration. To improve the performance, this paper proposes a new strategy adaptation method, named explicit adaptation scheme (Ea scheme), which separates multiple strategies and employs them on-demand. It is done by dividing the evolution process into several Selective-candidate with Similarity Selection (SCSS) generations and adaptive generations. In the SCSS generations, the exploitation and exploration needs are learnt by utilizing a balanced strategy. To meet these needs, in adaptive generations, two other strategies, exploitative or explorative is adaptively used. Experimental studies on benchmark functions demonstrate the effectiveness of Ea scheme when compared with its variants and other adaptation methods. Furthermore, performance comparisons with state-of-the-art evolutionary algorithms and swarm intelligence-based algorithms show that EaDE is very competitive. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据