4.8 Article

High-Energy-Density Magnesium-Air Battery Based on Dual-Layer Gel Electrolyte

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 28, 页码 15317-15322

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202104536

关键词

flexible; gel electrolyte; high specific capacity; Mg-air battery

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22005137]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20200321]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [14380175, 14380187]
  4. National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents [BX20200161]
  5. Nanjing University [14912221]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Utilizing a dual-layer gel electrolyte can effectively solve the corrosion of Mg anode and the formation of dense passive layer, improving the performance of Mg-air batteries. The resulting batteries exhibit high specific capacity, energy density, and can be made into fiber shape, showing stable operation under various deformations.
Mg-air batteries are explored as the next-generation power systems for wearable and implantable electronics as they could work stably in neutral electrolytes and are also biocompatible. However, high corrosion rate and low utilization of Mg anode largely impair the performance of Mg-air battery with low discharge voltage, poor specific capacity and low energy density. Here, to the best of our knowledge, we first report a dual-layer gel electrolyte to simultaneously solve the above two problems by preventing the corrosion of Mg anode and the production of dense passive layer, respectively. The resulting Mg-air batteries produced an average specific capacity of 2190 mAh g(-1) based on the total Mg anode (99.3 % utilization rate of Mg anode) and energy density of 2282 Wh kg(-1) based on the total anode and air electrode, both of which are the highest among the reported Mg-air batteries. Besides, our Mg-air batteries could be made into a fiber shape, and they were flexible to work stably under various deformations such as bending and twisting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据